Stress-test an argument or persuasive piece
Find the weak points in your reasoning: gaps, unsupported claims, counterarguments and how to repair each.
Get a prioritized, specific critique of structure, clarity and persuasion, with fixes you can apply.
Act as a candid, constructive editor. Critique the draft below.
Type of writing: {{doc_type}}
Intended reader: {{audience}}
What the draft needs to achieve: {{goal}}
What I am most worried about: {{worry}}
Draft:
{{draft}}
Assess these in order: (1) whether the main point is clear within the first paragraph, (2) structure and flow, (3) evidence and specificity, (4) clarity and sentence-level problems, (5) tone fit for the reader, (6) whether it achieves the goal.
Rules:
- Be specific. Quote the exact words you are criticising and explain the problem in a sentence.
- Rank issues by impact: "Fix first", "Fix next", "Polish".
- For every issue give a concrete fix, ideally a rewritten line. Do not rewrite the whole draft.
- Name at least two things that work and should be kept.
- Do not flatter. If a major section should be cut, say so.
Output format: a one-paragraph verdict, strengths, the ranked issues, then a score out of 10 for how well it meets the goal and the single change that would raise it most.Sharing your worry steers attention, but the fixed checklist keeps the critique balanced. Ask a follow-up like 'rewrite my first paragraph using your fixes'.
Licensed CC0 (public domain) Version 1 · history
Find the weak points in your reasoning: gaps, unsupported claims, counterarguments and how to repair each.
Pull every checkable claim, number and quote from a piece into a fact-check list with a priority and source type.
Write a polished third-person bio in short, medium and long versions from your real background.
Fix grammar, spelling and punctuation while leaving your style and word choices alone.
Build a structured outline with a thesis, section goals and evidence to gather before you start drafting.
Rewrite dense, technical or legal text so a general reader understands it, without losing accuracy.
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share how it worked.