Extract claims and facts to verify
Pull every checkable claim, number and quote from a piece into a fact-check list with a priority and source type.
Rewrite dense, technical or legal text so a general reader understands it, without losing accuracy.
Rewrite the text below in plain language for {{audience}}.
Reading level target: {{reading_level}}
Purpose of the text: {{purpose}}
Text:
{{text}}
Rules:
- Keep the meaning exact. Do not drop conditions, exceptions, deadlines, amounts or obligations.
- Use short sentences, everyday words and active voice. Put the most important thing first.
- Replace jargon with plain words. If a technical term must stay, explain it once in brackets.
- Address the reader as "you" where the text speaks to them.
- Use a short list for steps or requirements.
- If something is ambiguous in the source, do not resolve it by guessing. Mark it with [unclear in source: ...].
Output format:
1. The plain-language version.
2. A glossary of terms you replaced or explained (term: plain meaning).
3. A short "What changed in meaning?" statement, which should say "Nothing" unless you had to make a judgment call.The meaning-check step guards against oversimplification. For anything legally binding, have a professional review the plain version before you publish it.
Licensed CC0 (public domain) Version 1 · history
Pull every checkable claim, number and quote from a piece into a fact-check list with a priority and source type.
Find the weak points in your reasoning: gaps, unsupported claims, counterarguments and how to repair each.
Fix grammar, spelling and punctuation while leaving your style and word choices alone.
Get a prioritized, specific critique of structure, clarity and persuasion, with fixes you can apply.
Shift a message's tone, from blunt to warm or casual to formal, while preserving every fact.
Cut filler and repetition from your draft while keeping your voice, with a log of what changed.
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share how it worked.