On-page SEO audit of a single page

Audit one page's content and markup against a target keyword and get a prioritized fix list with rewritten title, headings and intro.

LLazyPrompt(@lazyprompt)Marketing & SEOCritiqueWorks with any model
No ratings yetSign in to rate
Save 0 Fork Report
Prompt template
Act as an on-page SEO reviewer. Audit the page below for the target keyword. Base your findings only on the content I paste; do not claim to know rankings, traffic or what competitors have unless I tell you.

Target keyword: {{keyword}}
Search intent I believe it serves: {{intent}}
Page URL: {{url}}
Current title tag: {{title_tag}}
Current meta description: {{meta}}

Page content (headings marked with #, ##, ###):
"""
{{content}}
"""

Check and report on
1. Intent match: does the page deliver what a searcher for this keyword expects, and early enough?
2. Title and meta: length, keyword placement, appeal. Provide improved versions with character counts.
3. Heading structure: one clear H1, logical H2/H3, and missing subtopics a reader would expect.
4. Content quality: thin sections, vague claims, missing examples, unanswered questions, outdated statements to verify.
5. Keyword use: natural presence in the intro, headings and body, without stuffing. Suggest related terms to add only where they help the reader.
6. Internal links, images and alt text, schema or FAQ opportunities: what to check, since I have not provided markup.
7. Trust signals: author, sources, dates, first-hand experience.

Output: a score out of 10 for each area with a sentence of reasoning, then a fix list ranked High, Medium, Low with the effort for each, then a rewritten intro paragraph (under 100 words).
Example output
## Scores | Area | Score | Reason | |---|---|---| | Intent match | 3/10 | Searcher wants desks that fit small rooms; page never mentions dimensions or space | | Title and meta | 2/10 | Keyword stuffed, over 60 characters (72), no benefit | | Headings | 3/10 | H1 is generic; no sections on size, weight capacity, or compact designs | | Content quality | 2/10 | Repetitive, unsupported ("good for health"), picks without reasons | | Keyword use | 4/10 | Keyword varies but "small spaces" never appears | | Technical checks | n/a | Markup not provided | | Trust | 2/10 | No author, testing method or date | ## Fix list **High** 1. Rewrite title (below). Effort: low. 2. Add a comparison of compact desks with width, depth and weight capacity. Effort: medium. 3. Explain why you picked each desk and what you tested. Effort: medium. **Medium** 4. Change H1 to match the query; add H2s for "Measure your space" and "Desks under 40 inches wide". 5. Add an author line and review date. **Low** 6. Add FAQ about balance boards and mats; check image alt text and internal links to ergonomics content. ## Improved title and meta Title (58): Best Standing Desks for Small Spaces (Tested) Meta (151): Compact standing desks compared by width, weight capacity and stability, with measuring tips for apartments and home offices. ## Rewritten intro Short on space? A good standing desk for a small room needs to be narrow, stable and easy to adjust. We compared compact models by width, depth and weight capacity so you can see which one fits your corner.

Why it works

Scoring each area and ranking fixes by effort turns a vague audit into a to-do list. For sharper findings, include your actual HTML or a Search Console query list in a follow-up message.

Licensed CC0 (public domain) Version 1 · history