Market sizing with explicit assumptions
Estimate TAM, SAM and SOM using bottom-up and top-down methods, with every assumption listed and a sensitivity range.
Build a practical go-to-market plan covering segment, positioning, channels, launch sequence, budget and the metrics that tell you it is working.
Create a go-to-market plan for {{product}}.
Target customer: {{customer}}
Problem solved and key differentiator: {{value}}
Pricing: {{pricing}}
Budget and team available: {{resources}}
Launch window: {{timing}}
Main goal for the first 90 days: {{goal}}
Structure the plan like this:
1. **Beachhead segment**: the narrow group to win first, why them, and how to recognise them (3 qualifying traits). Say what you deliberately leave out.
2. **Positioning**: a one-line statement using "For [who] who [need], [product] is a [category] that [benefit], unlike [alternative]". Add 3 proof points and the main objection with a reply.
3. **Channel plan**: pick the best 2 channels (not 6) and explain why. For each: the tactic, the weekly effort, the expected cost per lead or sign-up (state as an estimate), and how to know whether it works.
4. **Launch timeline**: week by week for the first 12 weeks: pre-launch, launch and post-launch actions with owners.
5. **Funnel math**: working backwards from the 90-day goal, how many leads, trials and conversions I need, with clearly labelled assumptions.
6. **Budget allocation** within my limit.
7. **Metrics and decision rules**: 5 metrics, with the number at which I double down on a channel or stop it at week 6.
8. **Biggest risks** and the plan if the launch underperforms.Limiting the plan to two channels and one beachhead segment is what makes it executable for a small team. The funnel arithmetic shows early whether your goal is realistic.
Licensed CC0 (public domain) Version 1 · history
Estimate TAM, SAM and SOM using bottom-up and top-down methods, with every assumption listed and a sensitivity range.
Compare three pricing models for your product, test them against your costs and customers, and get a recommended price test plan.
Investigate why a key metric moved: a structured hypothesis tree, the data cuts to run, and a prioritized plan to confirm and fix.
Write a persuasive but honest business case with costs, benefits, ROI, payback, risks and a clear ask for approval.
Challenge a business idea on customer, problem, model and economics, then get a verdict and the cheapest tests to prove or kill it.
Map a messy workflow, find the bottlenecks and waste, and get ranked improvements with effort, impact and a pilot plan.
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share how it worked.