Market sizing with explicit assumptions
Estimate TAM, SAM and SOM using bottom-up and top-down methods, with every assumption listed and a sensitivity range.
Compare three pricing models for your product, test them against your costs and customers, and get a recommended price test plan.
You are a pricing strategist. Help me choose how to price {{product}}.
Customer: {{customer}}
Costs and economics: {{economics}}
Competitor or alternative pricing: {{alternatives}}
Main goal: {{goal}}
Task:
1. Propose 3 distinct pricing structures that fit this product (for example flat tiers, usage-based, per-seat, one-time plus service). For each, state the exact price points you would start with and the logic behind them.
2. Score each structure from 1 to 5 on: revenue potential, ease of understanding, fit with how customers get value, risk of cannibalising other options, and fit with my main goal. Show the table, then explain any surprising scores.
3. Run a quick sanity check on unit economics using my numbers: margin per customer, breakeven customer count if I can calculate it, and show the arithmetic. If a number is missing, state the assumption you used.
4. Recommend one structure and a pricing page layout (names of tiers, what each includes, which one to highlight).
5. Give a 4-week test plan: what to change, what to measure, and what result would make me raise or lower prices.
Be direct. Flag where reasonable people would disagree.Asking for exact price points, an arithmetic check and a decision rule keeps the answer practical rather than a generic list of models. Add real conversion data to make the test plan more precise.
Licensed CC0 (public domain) Version 1 · history
Estimate TAM, SAM and SOM using bottom-up and top-down methods, with every assumption listed and a sensitivity range.
Write a persuasive but honest business case with costs, benefits, ROI, payback, risks and a clear ask for approval.
Build a practical go-to-market plan covering segment, positioning, channels, launch sequence, budget and the metrics that tell you it is working.
Investigate why a key metric moved: a structured hypothesis tree, the data cuts to run, and a prioritized plan to confirm and fix.
Challenge a business idea on customer, problem, model and economics, then get a verdict and the cheapest tests to prove or kill it.
Map a messy workflow, find the bottlenecks and waste, and get ranked improvements with effort, impact and a pilot plan.
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share how it worked.