Market sizing with explicit assumptions
Estimate TAM, SAM and SOM using bottom-up and top-down methods, with every assumption listed and a sensitivity range.
Turn a business, product or project into a sharp SWOT with evidence, cross-links between quadrants and three priority moves.
Run a SWOT analysis for {{subject}} in the context of {{market_context}}.
What I know:
{{facts}}
Rules:
- Strengths and weaknesses are internal and within our control. Opportunities and threats are external. Move anything that sits in the wrong quadrant.
- Every point must be specific and carry a one-line piece of evidence or reasoning. Drop generic items such as "strong brand" unless you can say why.
- Give 4 to 5 points per quadrant, ranked by impact.
- If my facts are too thin to support a quadrant, say what is missing instead of inventing details.
Output format:
1. A 2x2 table with the four quadrants.
2. "Cross-links": 3 strategic moves, each tagged SO (use a strength to capture an opportunity), WO (fix a weakness to capture an opportunity), ST (use a strength against a threat) or WT (limit exposure).
3. "Do first": the single move you would start this quarter, with the reason and the first concrete step.
4. "Assumptions to verify": up to 3 claims you leaned on that I should check.
Time horizon: {{horizon}}.Splitting internal and external factors and forcing cross-links is what turns a list into strategy. Paste real numbers into the facts field and the output gets much sharper.
Licensed CC0 (public domain) Version 1 · history
Estimate TAM, SAM and SOM using bottom-up and top-down methods, with every assumption listed and a sensitivity range.
Investigate why a key metric moved: a structured hypothesis tree, the data cuts to run, and a prioritized plan to confirm and fix.
Write a persuasive but honest business case with costs, benefits, ROI, payback, risks and a clear ask for approval.
Build a practical go-to-market plan covering segment, positioning, channels, launch sequence, budget and the metrics that tell you it is working.
Map a messy workflow, find the bottlenecks and waste, and get ranked improvements with effort, impact and a pilot plan.
Write a one-to-two-page decision memo that frames the choice, compares options honestly, states a recommendation and names the risks.
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share how it worked.